Abstract # 2844 Event # 6:

Scheduled for Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:00 AM-10:10 AM: Session 2 (Medallion Ballroom A) Oral Presentation


A. L. Martin1,2, A. N. Franklin1 and M. A. Bloomsmith1
1Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA, 2Center for Conservation and Behavior, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology

Positive reinforcement training relies on identifying an effective reinforcing consequence, often food, to be presented contingent on the performance of the desired behavior. Prior to training sessions, we used a multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference test to identify the food preference of 24 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). The monkeys showed significant preferences among five food items [Friedman’s Test: X2(4)=43.04, P<0.01]. Food rankings were moderately stable across individuals [Kendall’s W=0.49], and the stability of individuals’ preferences across time ranged from very low [Kendall’s W=0.04] to quite high [W=0.90]. To evaluate the effect of food preference on training, monkeys were given their high preference food, their low preference food, or a food chosen randomly from the five foods tested. An engagement score based on the animal’s compliance was recorded for each training session. Engagement during training of the first behavior differed significantly by food preference assignment [ANOVA: F(2, 23)=7.02, P<0.01], with those receiving their high preference food demonstrating higher levels of engagement than those given their low preference food. Engagement scores did not differ for later training tasks, perhaps indicating that food preference is most important early in the process. The MSWO technique was useful in determining food item preferences, and using the preference information improved the efficiency of training sessions.